Monday, 7 October 2013
Analysis of students work
WHAT WENT WELL:
- Close up of instruments
- Extreme close up of guitar with a narrow depth of field
- Costume: 'Indie style'
- Lighting good in majority of clip
EVEN BETTER IF:
- Lip syncing not matched up all the time
- Camera control
- Random slow motion
- Poor composition: 2 people on bench behind during performance shot
- Unclear narrative
WHAT WENT WELL:
- Editing in pace with the music
- Photobooth effect
- Non diegetic to diegetic music
- Clear narrative
- Balanced number of cuts
- Flashbacks were clear
- Instruments were synced
- Well choreographed
- Costumes match genre
EVEN BETTER IF:
- Camera control
- Framing slightly off
- Lighting hasn't been thought about
- Lip syncing
WHAT WENT WELL:
- Narrative matched lyrics: Andrew Goodwins theory
- Cutting pace goes with music towards the end
- Good location for the band
- Costume matches genre
-Variety of shots
- Good lip syncing
EVEN BETTER IF:
- Wasn't all in black and white
- Don't understand narrative
- Don't like the clip where the girl sings
WHAT WENT WELL:
- Clothing fits genre
- Location fits genre
- Experimented with green screen
EVEN BETTER IF:
- Lip syncing improved
- Used the green screen to much
- No variety of shots
- Switches performers to many times
- Narrative not very clear
WHAT WENT WELL:
- Clear flashbacks/dreams
- Narrative matches lyrics: Andrew Goodwin
EVEN BETTER IF:
- Camera control
- Performance shots were missing
- Too many effects
- Framing and lighting not thought about
- Narrative is confusing
Labels:
Research
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment